by Rich Posson, technical analyst RF Posson & CompanyIn
today's freer and more volatile market place many a trader is having difficulty with the use of standard economic based analysis and trading. Under standard economics if a market price falls then demand
should increase. And, even today this is so but today's trading environment is more complex in that as prices drop, demand will actually drop first and then increase later. This scenario is best
explained by the new economics that is rapidly replacing the old and that is behavioral economics. Behavioral science, behavioral finance and market psychology and socio economics are all "buzz"
words in today's economic, political and business discussions.
Technical analysis has been around for perhaps centuries but only now is it being recognized as a behavioral science or behavioral economic study in
regards to markets. Indeed even several prestigious universities have launched not only technical analytical curriculums but also even entire foundations for the study of such.
There are many types of
technical analysis just as there are many types of traders and analysts. I will discuss some of the major forms of analysis that I use but first I wish to discuss a little of the psychological side.
The emotion sequence cycle:
To a buyer (who did not buy) as prices begin to run up there is first an emotional response of "denial and shock", followed by the second phase of
"anger" and then still a third phase on explosive prices that is "depression". The final phase is that of "acceptance", one learns to live with the pain of higher prices for
one's inputs or missing out on an investment.
This same sequence could be applied to the seller of a commodity in that they did not sell when they should have and prices dropped drastically. An investor
could also experience these emotions in being on the wrong side of the market.
There is no doubt a positive side of this sequence in which one may very well reach the emotional peak of "ecstatic" by
basically being on the right side of a large price movement. The point is that there is indeed emotion involved in the markets and the different types of emotion leads to different responses to
trading. Such as we buy and then the price drops and we are mad and so we buy more because we are right and it is a "better bargain now". And then, the price drops some more and we panic
perhaps even dump the position. We all know what happens next---the bottom arrives! A summary phrase is as old as the markets and that is "fear and greed".
(These emotional phases were
adapted from the work of Sharon Danes, Professor at UMN in regards to helping farmers, families and non-farm businesses cope with change and rapid change such as today's business environment.)
The market participation sequence cycle:
Dr Pruden of GGU and whom I have had personal instruction in regards to Wyckoff technical analysis and behavioral finance has put together another form of
market behavior. It is referred to as the Pruden Adoption Diffusion model which essentially says that the growth of market participation for an up move or down move in prices is bell shaped and can be
classified in phases or types of traders. First are the innovators or "insiders", followed by the early adopters, then the early majority, the late majority and finally the laggards. By time
the laggards arrive the market has been saturated with buyers if an up movement or by sellers if a down move. Essentially it is over by time the laggards arrive and of course the insiders are long gone.
Our analysis
The insider?
Richard D. Wyckoff was a very successful trader and market educator who grew up in the days of where big money could run manipulative "campaigns" in
selected markets. Mr. Wyckoff realized a pattern to this kind of trading and adapted it to the non- manipulated markets. He believed that a trader ought to view the market as if it were being traded
and under control of one person--the composite operator. From this view point he believed one could tap into the psychology of the market and grasp a feel for the demand and supply elements of a market.
Under
Wyckoff thinking there are 3 laws: supply/demand, cause and effect and effort vs result. Essentially if you don't have demand taking over supply then you can't have higher prices, but you need to build a
cause and trigger a response or effect and finally the effort from the prevailing buyers or sellers needs to have a related response. With Wyckoff one believes markets must spend some time in a guiet range
where the "smart money" accumulates a position (accumulation phase). The "crowd" eventually wakes up to the fact that prices should head higher and it is their buying that creates the
"mark up phase". The smart money then eventually unloads on the crowd in a phase of "distribution" which can evolve into a "mark down phase" of prices.
Cycles
I am not sure anyone knows what creates cycles which are repetitive bottoms and tops viewed in relation to time not price. An example is a cycle of 20 weeks simply implies that the market for
some strange reason will stop going down and reverse upwards. In relation to market psychology I hypothesize that cycle bottoms or tops are extremes of market psychology, that they are also periods of
reality or in fact a reality check point. We simply ask ourselves why are we paying or selling at that price or more important at that time. Everything in between is the up trend or downtrend and I
believe the trend is the actual phase of illusion. An entire cycle then encompasses the psychological phases and the conflict between reality and illusion. Why cycles are also repetitive I do not know
and people are afraid to acknowledge that their lives, markets or businesses may operate in a repetitive manor. But a chart is worth a thousand words in regards to opening one's mind to cycles.
Cycle series analysis
I finish this discussion with the primary form of analysis that I use and that is what I have called and discovered as Cycle Series Analysis CSA. To be brief
as possible, this form of cyclical analysis states that we should throw out all cycles that will not work as an integrated system or if you will a family of cycles. What we want to do is build models that
incorporate short term to long term cycles. We want these cycles to work together in that a certain number or range of number of say a short term cycle should equal the length of a larger long term
cycle. This allows us to time the large cycle by tracking the smaller cycles.
These models then help to explain all fluctuations in the market and can provide a wide variety of buy or sell signals in
relation to the user's needs. The bigger the cycle the bigger the expected move. These cyclic models should be able to link with the various degrees or magnitude of market psychology, fundamental news
and the type of traders. There are many different types of traders in the market place, those who trade for only a few days to those who trade for months or years. So should we not expect many
different lengths of cycles?
One can see the economic side of cycles when one views the long cycles of 3 years to 36 years or more.
In Joseph Schumpeter's Business Cycles he too showed cycles within cycles and
believed in cyclic economics. And his work has seen a renewed interest as of late. It is interesting to see a say a top of a 9 year cycle will bring about more serious economic impact and more
importantly negative sentiment/psychology than say what a 3 year cyclical top can create.
Is this then the new economic analysis? For now all I know is that it brings an interesting opinion of the markets
and their future fluctuations.
" a cycle is a summary of history, statistics, innovation and economics.."
We can assist in education and design of hedging/marketing programs. We also consult in
business risk management in regards to hedging or commodity marketing. Our research also includes market timing and forecasting methods. Call 386-785-1585 for details.